• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!


DNA Marker Mutation Rates

Page history last edited by PBworks 17 years, 5 months ago


There is An Overview and Discussion of Various DNA Mutation Rates at the the kerchner.com site that notes that DNA mutation rates vary between markers and between families.


It reports that early studies used an average rate of one per 500 generations or a rate of 0.002. A recent FTDNA study is said to indicate an average rate of 0.004.



Using the average mutation rate for random changes, some estimates can be made of a match depending on the number of markers tested.


For 12 markers no change could be expected over several dozen generations. This means matches can be common between people with different surnames.


For 37 markers it is a theoretical estimate of a change in 12 generations. So a match is a good indicator of a common ancestor within the time frame of usage of surnames. There still is the probability of a common ancestor much further back in time or a random combination of markers from very ancient times.



Data is being collected at the kerchner.com site on mutations with an Mutation Rate Log Analysis. There are more than 50 surname groups with separate data for 12, 25, 37 markers. For calculations based on father-son mutations in 37 markers cases the average of mutations so far is 0.0043 or 1/232 generations. The fastest rate was 0.009 or 1/111 generations


In the particular case of our project, with 37 marker results there are two cases (464 and 439) of one marker changing. These markers are identified as "fast moving" with a rate on the order of 0.005, 1/200 generations or about 6000 years. Estimators of the time to a common ancestor use the assumptions on mutation rate as well as probabilities. For this case of 36 of 37 matching, the Yutility estimator comes up with 240 years (while we know from records that it is 330 years). For the 37 of 37 match it comes up with 90 years (or 3 generations). A viewpoint on this could be that a mutation could happen in any generation and the fact that there are none in 37 markers leads to the time estimate with a probability (50% was used).


The FTDNA estimator comes up with differenent numbers. For the 36 of 37 match they show at 4 generations a 59% probability of a common ancestor. For the 37 of 37 match at 2 generations there is a 59% probability.


A personal preference is to look at the general time frame out of the Yutility estimator.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.